Sunday, September 14, 2008

What (some) Republicans are saying about Sarah Palin

I thought I might expand on a reply I gave to "anonymous", who commented on my post Palin's interview with Charlie Gibson, part 1 - EPIC FAIL.

I think it's rather interesting how many Republicans, conservatives and other right-leaning folk are decidedly unenthusiastic about Sarah Palin - and about how this reflects on John McCain's judgement in choosing her as his running mate.

Firstly, here is Karl Rove on Face the Nation, August 10:

Karl Rove argued that if Obama picked Tim Kaine for VP, it would be for purely political reasons and would ignore the responsibilities of the presidency. On the show, Rove said the following -

"I think he's going to make an intensely political choice, not a governing choice," Rove said. "He's going to view this through the prism of a candidate, not through the prism of president; that is to say, he's going to pick somebody that he thinks will on the margin help him in a state like Indiana or Missouri or Virginia. He's not going to be thinking big and broad about the responsibilities of president...

...With all due respect again to Governor Kaine, he's been a governor for three years, he's been able but undistinguished, I don't think people could really name a big, important thing that he's done. He was mayor of the 105th largest city in America...

...So if he were to pick Governor Kaine, it would be an intensely political choice where he said, 'You know what? I'm really not, first and foremost, concerned with, is this person capable of being president of the United States? What I'm concerned about is, can he bring me the electoral votes of the state of Virginia, the 13 electoral votes in Virginia?'..."

And here he is saying it. Striking how Palin's experience is even less than Tim Kaine's, isn't it?:



Next, here are Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan talking incredulously about the possible nomination of Palin as VP candidate (on the morning the announcement was made, but before the announcement itself):



Charles Krauthammer in The Washington Post, August 29 - The Palin Puzzle:
The Palin selection completely undercuts the argument about Obama's inexperience and readiness to lead -- on the theory that because Palin is a maverick and a corruption fighter, she bolsters McCain's claim to be the reformer in this campaign...

...To gratuitously undercut the remarkably successful "Is he ready to lead" line of attack seems near suicidal.


Ramesh Ponnuru in the National Review Online, August 29 - Cold Water on Palin:
Palin has been governor for about two minutes. Thanks to McCain’s decision, Palin could be commander-in-chief next year. That may strike people as a reckless choice; it strikes me that way. And McCain's age raised the stakes on this issue...

...Can anyone say with a straight face that Palin would have gotten picked if she were a man?


David Frum in the National Review Online, August 29 - Palin:
The longer I think about it, the less well this selection sits with me. And I increasingly doubt that it will prove good politics. The Palin choice looks cynical. The wires are showing...

...Here's I fear the worst harm that may be done by this selection. The McCain campaign's slogan is "country first." It's a good slogan, and it aptly describes John McCain, one of the most self-sacrificing, gallant, and honorable men ever to seek the presidency.

But question: If it were your decision, and you were putting your country first, would you put an untested small-town mayor a heartbeat away from the presidency?


Mark Ambinder talking about Republican political strategists in The Atlantic, August 29 - GOP Strategists Mixed Reviews:
I cannot overestimate the degree to which Republican political strategists were stunned by the pick...

...A few are cautiously optimistic that it'll turn out OK, but most of the strategists and consultants I've spoken to, e-mailed with, or read/watched are struggling with it. They expect her to have a good week... and then to crash and burn when she hits the campaign trail as scrutiny catches up with her.

Some of these strategists are close to those Republicans who were vetted but not picked, but many of them aren't. "It's like playing poker blind," one strategist said. Another e-mailed: "Obama's lack of readiness was THE only way to win." When these Republicans ask the McCain campaign for guidance, all they hear back is: "She's more experienced than Obama is."


David Frum in the National Post, August 29 - Palin the irresponsible choice?:
Ms. Palin's experience in government makes Barack Obama look like George C. Marshall. She served two terms on the city council of Wasilla, Alaska, population 9,000. She served two terms as mayor. In November, 2006, she was elected governor of the state, a job she has held for a little more than 18 months. She has zero foreign policy experience, and no record on national security issues.


David Frum in the National Review Online, August 30 - My Palin Mailbox - Updating:
Likewise, had Sarah Palin decided in 2005 to run for president in 2008 - had she spent 3 years mastering the issues and explaining her views in public statements - had she one by one recruited leading experts on economic and defense issues to her cause and privately explored the issues of the day with them - then her current background would not be disqualifying. Indeed it would resemble that of many successful presidents.

None of those things happened. She was plucked by John McCain because of an electoral calculus. She could be vice president of the United States in January 2009 - and president at any moment thereafter, abruptly thrust in supreme command of two wars in two different countries. And who knows how she'll do? She does not know what she would do. Yes she might turn out to be a Harry Truman. Or she might be an Andrew Johnson. Wouldn't you wish for some hint in advance of which it might be?


Shannen Coffin in the National Review Online, August 30 - Palin Pick:
But the notion of plucking a governor with less than two years of experience that would count for anything (unless your a fan of movies like Dave) to serve as Vice President to a 72-year old President is troubling, to say the least. The pick comes with enormous risk, both as a matter of politics, and more importantly, governance...

...That lack of experience is a political liability for the very reason that it is a real liability...

...The choice also says a lot about McCain. First, that he is a bit desparate [sic]...

...Second, that he is one arrogant SOB. McCain is essentially telling the world that he doesn't really need a Vice President.


Andrew Sullivan, quoting an email from an unnamed Republican voter in The Daily Dish, August 31 - The Shock Of Palin:
I've voted a straight Republican ticket every year of my life since 1975, when I first came of voting age, but I was stunned and horrified by McCain's choice of Palin. I simply cannot even consider voting for McCain after this choice, which speaks loudly of his own selfishness and fundamental frivolousness...

...While Obama might do a hundred things as President that I believe are bad for the country, I am confident that he would surround himself with experienced, informed, competent advisors and that he would make no world-destroying blunders. I cannot say the same about Palin and, in view of what this choice reveals about McCain's character and judgment, I cannot say the same of him either.


David Brooks in a New York Times Op-Ed, September 1 - What the Palin Pick Says:
So my worries about Palin are not (primarily) about her lack of experience...

...My worry about Palin is that she shares McCain's primary weakness - that she has a tendency to substitute a moral philosophy for a political philosophy...

... If McCain is elected, he will face conditions tailor-made to foster disorder. He will be leading a divided and philosophically exhausted party. There simply aren't enough Republican experts left to staff an administration, so he will have to throw together a hodgepodge with independents and Democrats. He will confront Democratic majorities that will be enraged and recriminatory.

On top of these conditions, he will have his own freewheeling qualities: a restless, thrill-seeking personality, a tendency to personalize issues, a tendency to lead life as a string of virtuous crusades.

He really needs someone to impose a policy structure on his moral intuitions. He needs a very senior person who can organize a vast administration and insist that he tame his lone-pilot tendencies and work through the established corridors - the National Security Council, the Domestic Policy Council. He needs a near-equal who can turn his instincts, which are great, into a doctrine that everybody else can predict and understand.

Rob Portman or Bob Gates wouldn't have been politically exciting, but they are capable of performing those tasks. Palin, for all her gifts, is not. She underlines McCain's strength without compensating for his weaknesses. The real second fiddle job is still unfilled.


Dr Laura (!) in her blog, September 2 - Sarah Palin and Motherhood:
I am extremely disappointed in the choice of Sarah Palin as the Vice Presidential candidate of the Republican Party. I will still vote for Senator McCain, because I am very concerned about having a fundamental leftist, especially one who is a marvelous orator, as President...

...I am haunted by the family pictures of the Palins during political photo-ops, showing the eldest daughter, now pregnant with her own child, cuddling the family's newborn. When Mom and Dad both work full-time (no matter how many folks get involved with the children), it becomes a somewhat chaotic situation. Certainly, if a child becomes ill and is rushed to the hospital, and you're on the hotline with both Israel and Iran as nuclear tempers are flaring, where's your attention going to be? Where should your attention be? Well, once you put your hand on the Bible and make that oath, your attention has to be with the government of the United States of America.


From a report on Huffington Post about off-mike comments by Peggy Noonan and Mike Murphy, September 3 - Peggy Noonan, Mike Murphy Caught On Tape Disparaging Palin Choice: "Political Bullshit," "Gimmicky":
Wall Street Journal columnist and former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan and former John McCain adviser, Time columnist, and MSNBC contributor Mike Murphy were caught on tape disparaging John McCain's selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his Vice Presidential running mate.

"It's over," Noonan said.

When Chuck Todd asked her if this was the most qualified woman the Republicans could nominate, Noonan responded, "The most qualified? No. I think they went for this, excuse me, political bullshit about narratives. Every time the Republicans do that, because that's not where they live and that's not what they're good at, they blow it."

Murphy characterized the choices as "cynical" and "gimmicky."



Ben Stein, being interviewed on CNN, September 3 at the Republican convention:
I don't think she has said a word in her whole life about the national economy, which contributes to making this one of the oddest choices in the history of presidential politics. I think this may go down as the most peculiar vice-presidential choice there's ever been...

...She should have Henry Kissinger baby-sitting her!



David Frum in the National Review Online, September 11 - Presidential Knowledge:
Somebody who knew President Bush well once remarked to me. "You'll notice he never asks questions."

"Why not?" I said.

"Because he doesn't know what it's okay for him not to know."

Again and again through the ABC interview with Sarah Palin, Gibson asked questions to which an evasive answer would have been perfectly appropriate...

...But Palin never punted. She tried to bluff her way through, pretending to know what she obviously did not know. It's an understandable impulse, and in the context of a single interview, not so very terrible. But is it an impulse that she'd lay aside once in office? Or is it a deeper habit? A lot may turn on the answer to that question.


Kristen Soltis at The Next Right, September 12 - Where's Sarah? The Palin Interview, Night One:
There were oh so many times when I could practically envision the talking points. "We shouldn't second guess Israel. No matter what, they are our ally. We don't second guess Israel." And so it went. "We can't second guess Israel, Charlie."

Whether that's the correct policy or not what I'm debating. What matters is that it didn't seem like it was really her opinion. I can't see inside the mind of Sarah Palin, so I have no place saying if it is ACTUALLY her opinion or not. But the feel of it? It didn't feel genuine. It felt like a repeated talking point. It felt "done".

And if you're going to try not to sound political, of all the things you can't afford to do, it's sound like Bush. Remember - he was the candidate of cowboy authenticity, shoot-em-straightness, of "lets do this thing, lets get them terrorists". No doubt Palin has been prepped by Steve Schmidt (Rove's protege), Nicolle Wallace (former Bush staffer). So maybe that's why I'm so sensitive to Bush-sounding language.


Ross Douthat in The Atlantic, September 12 - Will McCain Ruin Palin, Revisited:
But a vice-presidential run isn't the ideal place to develop that potential in the best of times, and a vice-presidential run under the tutelage of the McCain campaign is likely to produce a lot more of what we saw from Palin in her interview last night: Rigorously memorized, carefully regurgitated talking points, a determination to avoid making enormous gaffes, and not much else.


Ross Douthat in The Atlantic, September 13 - Sarah The Unready:
Now that we've seen the entirety of the Palin-Gibson tete-a-tete, I concur with Rich Lowry and Rod Dreher. The most that can be said in her defense is that she kept her cool and avoided any brutal gaffes; other than that, she seemed about an inch deep on every issue outside her comfort zone.


Rich Lowry in the National Review Online, September 13 - Palin's Performance - Fine, But...:
My take (and I didn't see the bits that aired on 20/20 or Nightline last night, although I read the transcript) was that she survived. That's all she had to do...

...But this was a merely adequate performance. The foreign-policy session was a white-knuckle affair. She barely got through it and showed no knowledge more than an inch deep...

...The fact still remains that she very likely didn't know any of the possible definitions of the Bush doctrine. I can't imagine if Obama had picked Gov. Tim Kaine and he had had a similar moment, conservatives would have rushed to say that the Bush doctrine is just too amorphous and complicated for him to know anything about it. Palin seemed weak on economic and budgetary policy too, talking in the vaguest generalities.


Rod Dreher in Crunchy Con at Beliefnet.com, September 12 - Latest ABC Palin interview -- not mo' better:
Just saw Palin talking about domestic issues on ABC World News Tonight. Depressing. Programmed, just like last night. Charlie Gibson asked her twice what she and McCain would do about the economy different from Bush. Answer: not much. Here's the Palin economic plan:

Get government out of the way of the private sector. Cut taxes. Control spending. And when Gibson pressed her, she added "reform agency oversight. "

Entitlement spending reform? Pass. They're going to cut spending by rooting out -- wait for it -- waste, fraud and abuse. (This year's GOP buzz word for that hoary phrase: "finding efficiencies.")

To quote the latest McCain commercial about Obama: "That's not change. That's more of the same."


************************************

But perhaps you don't believe that these people I've quoted above are "real" conservatives. Here are some details on each of them:

David Brooks - Canadian-American political and cultural commentator. Brooks served as a reporter for the Washington Times, a reporter and later op-ed editor for The New York Times, a senior editor at The Weekly Standard from its inception, a contributing editor at Newsweek and The Atlantic Monthly, and a commentator on NPR and The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer. Brooks, now a conservative, describes himself as being originally a liberal.

Pat Buchanan - former senior adviser to American presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagan, who sought the Republican presidential nomination in 1992 and 1996.

Shannen Coffin - attorney who served as general counsel to Dick Cheney until early November 2007. He was previously at the Department of Justice, where he served as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Division.

Ross Douthat - a "new-generation conservative" author and blogger. He is a senior editor at The Atlantic, and he has written Privilege: Harvard and the Education of the Ruling Class (Hyperion, 2005) and, with Reihan Salam, Grand New Party (Doubleday, 2008), which David Brooks called "best single roadmap of where the [Republican] party should and is likely to head."

Rod Dreher - Dallas-based writer and editor. He is an editorial writer and columnist for The Dallas Morning News and a contributor to The American Conservative and National Review. Previously, he was a columnist for The New York Post. He also runs a blog called "Crunchy Con" at beliefnet.com.

David Frum - Canadian-born conservative and journalist active in the both US and Canadian political arenas. A former economic speechwriter for George W. Bush.

Charles Krauthammer - Pulitzer Prize-winning syndicated columnist and commentator, generally considered a conservative or neoconservative. He appears regularly as a commentator on Fox News and as a weekly panelist on Inside Washington. His weekly column appears in the The Washington Post and is syndicated in more than 200 newspapers and media outlets. He is a contributing editor to the Weekly Standard and The New Republic.

Dr Laura - Laura Catherine Schlessinger, American radio host, author and conservative commentator. Once a professional counselor, Schlessinger offers advice to callers every day on her nationally-syndicated radio show, The Dr. Laura Program, which airs through Premiere Radio Networks.

Rich Lowry - editor of National Review and a syndicated columnist. He regularly appears on the Fox News Channel. He has guest-hosted on Hannity and Colmes and Fox & Friends, and is a guest panelist on PBS's "The McLaughlin Group" and Fox News Watch.

Mike Murphy - Republican political consultant. He has advised such nationally prominent Republicans as John McCain, Jeb Bush, John Engler, Tommy Thompson, Christie Whitman, Lamar Alexander, and Arnold Schwarzenegger. He was, until January 2006, an adviser to Mitt Romney, the Governor of Massachusetts and an about-to-become candidate for the Republican presidential nomination for the 2008 presidential election. He stepped down as a result of his role as chief strategist to Governor Romney as well as Senator McCain, who were both widely expected to be Republican challengers in the primaries of the 2008 Presidential election. Murphy said he had decided to be neutral in a contest between two close clients, although he would advise each informally.

Peggy Noonan - author of seven books on politics, religion and culture, a weekly columnist for The Wall Street Journal, and was a primary speech writer and Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan. She is considered a political conservative.

Ramesh Ponnuru - Washington, DC-based Indian American columnist and a senior editor for National Review magazine. He has also written for several other newspapers and publications, including The Weekly Standard, Policy Review, The New Republic and First Things. A conservative pundit, Ponnuru has appeared in many public affairs and news interview programs. He is perhaps best known for his 2006 book, The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life.

Karl Rove - Deputy Chief of Staff to George W Bush until his resignation on August 31, 2007. He has headed the Office of Political Affairs, the Office of Public Liaison, and the White House Office of Strategic Initiatives. Since leaving the White House, Rove has worked as a political analyst and contributor for Fox News, Newsweek, and the Wall Street Journal. Rove is an informal advisor to John McCain.

For most of his career prior to his employment at the White House, Rove was a political consultant almost exclusively for Republican candidates. Rove's campaign clients have included Bush, Senator John Ashcroft, Bill Clements, Senator John Cornyn, Governor Rick Perry, and Phil Gramm.

Joe Scarborough - former member of the United States House of Representatives from 1995 to 2001 as a Republican from the 1st district of Florida.

Kristen Soltis - Director of Policy Research for The Winston Group, a Republican affiliated public opinion research and strategic consulting firm in Washington, DC.

Ben Stein - American attorney, political figure, and entertainment personality who in his early career served as speechwriter for US presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. Recently, he has become an outspoken critic of evolutionary theory, which he describes as "Darwinism," and an advocate for intelligent design.

Andrew Sullivan - prominent blogger, author, and political commentator who considers himself to be a classical libertarian conservative.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Lies, lies and more lies - the McCain/Palin campaign

It seems as though, over the last few days, the traditional media has woken up to what the McCain/Palin campaign is doing - and are finally - finally - beginning to call them on it - something that the blogosphere's been doing for weeks. Yup - the media is using the "L" word.

The McCain/Palin campaign are LYING LIARS who are telling LIE after LIE after LIE.



I think it began with Paul Krugman's brilliant op-ed piece a couple of days ago in the New York Times. Entitled Blizzard of Lies, it tackles the McCain campaign's descent into the territory of lies, lies and more lies...

Paul Krugman wrote:

But I can't think of any precedent, at least in America, for the blizzard of lies since the Republican convention. The Bush campaign's lies in 2000 were artful - you needed some grasp of arithmetic to realize that you were being conned. This year, however, the McCain campaign keeps making assertions that anyone with an Internet connection can disprove in a minute, and repeating these assertions over and over again.

The Bridge to Nowhere that Palin was for before she was against - and which she continues to lie about in her stump speech...

Kindergarten sex-ed - in which Obama supported legislation calling for "age and developmentally appropriate education" and which the Repubs have lied about, saying he wants to teach little kids about sex before they can even read...

Palin's dodgy dealings wrt Troopergate, bringing her political power to bear on a personal issue - in which she lied by saying she had no influence on the firing, which has been disproved by a number of emails and phone calls - and who knows what else in the thousand emails she's so far refused to release (Cheney-like Executive Privilege, dontcha know?) and which at least some of which were CC'd to her non-office-holding, non-elected husband Todd...

Lipstick on a pig faux outrage - and faux feminism - and faux cries of "sexism" every time Palin's policies, inexperience or ability to be VP are questioned (not to mention McCain's judgement in picking her)...

Lies about earmarks which she and McCain say they're against, but which she certainly was for as Governor -

The Wall Street Journal - before they scrubbed the bolded bit ad replaced it with something more pro-Palin - wrote:
At a rally today, Sen. McCain again asserted that Sen. Obama has requested nearly a billion in earmarks. In fact, the Illinois senator requested $311 million last year, according to the Associated Press, and none this year. In comparison, Gov. Palin has requested $750 million in her two years as governor - which the AP says is the largest per-capita request in the nation.


The list goes on and on and on and on and on. Thank you Paul Krugman for telling it like it is. May the rest of the media continue to follow suit!

Paul Krugman wrote:
Still, how upset should we be about the McCain campaign's lies? I mean, politics ain't beanbag, and all that.

One answer is that the muck being hurled by the McCain campaign is preventing a debate on real issues - on whether the country really wants, for example, to continue the economic policies of the last eight years.

But there's another answer, which may be even more important: how a politician campaigns tells you a lot about how he or she would govern.


Seems like Krugman's comments might just have opened the floodgates - well, maybe made a teeny hole in the dam at least - because now they're all at it:

Making it up as they go along - Robyn E. Blumner in the St Petersburg Times:
The only thing "maverick" about McCain's use of lies to smear his opponent is how breathtakingly blatant they are. If the nation falls for this, the Lying Eyes campaign will have succeeded, and for all of us with eyes that saw through to the truth, there will be tears.


Experience 101 - Dick Cavett in the New York Times:
Back here in the past, when I'm writing this, we have just seen part one of her quizzing by Charles Gibson, with mixed reviews for both. So far I have not seen her confronted with some of the things about which she has been, to put it in that awful Diplomatically Correct phrase, "somewhat less than fully truthful." (Typesetter: If space is scarce, use "lying.") As in claiming "no thanks" to the bridge money while failing to disclose that she kept it.


McCain Barbs Stirring Outcry as Distortions - Michael Cooper and Jim Rutenberg in the New York Times:
In an interview Friday on the NY1 cable news channel, a McCain supporter, Senator Orrin G. Hatch of Utah, called "ridiculous" the implication that Mr. Obama's "lipstick on a pig" comment was a reference to Ms. Palin, whom he also defended as coming under unfair attack.

"The last month, for sure," said Don Sipple, a Republican advertising strategist, "I think the predominance of liberty taken with truth and the facts has been more McCain than Obama."

Indeed, in recent days, Mr. McCain has been increasingly called out by news organizations, editorial boards and independent analysts like FactCheck.org. The group, which does not judge whether one candidate is more misleading than another, has cried foul on Mr. McCain more than twice as often since the start of the political conventions as it has on Mr. Obama.


McCain fumbles Palin's record on earmark requests - Beth Fouhy at Associated Press:
Republican presidential candidate John McCain on Friday defended two debunked television ads attacking Democrat Barack Obama and claimed erroneously that running mate Sarah Palin never sought money for lawmakers' pet projects as Alaska governor.

Palin sought $197 million in so-called "earmarks" for 2009. In the previous budget year, she asked for earmarks worth $256 million.


McCain Wraps Distortions Around One Truth - Washington Post:
This John McCain commercial, which contains two significant distortions, is part of a larger effort to rule criticism of his running mate out of bounds and to paint her as the victim of unfair attacks from both Democrats and the media.


Palin won't concede change of heart on bridge - The Seattle Times:
"I told Congress 'thanks but no thanks' on that 'Bridge to Nowhere,'" Palin said repeatedly in her stump speeches, drawing roars of approval. But numerous news organizations found that she supported the bridge until it became a national symbol of excess, and then she turned against it.

In the latest in a series of interviews with Charles Gibson of ABC News, Palin did not concede any change of heart. "We killed that earmark," she said. "We killed that project."

Her comments came after McCain sat for a grilling on ABC's "The View," where he claimed erroneously that his running mate hadn't sought federal money.


McCain wrong on Palin earmarks - Tom Hamburger and Maeve Reston in the Los Angeles Times:
John McCain got it wrong Friday when he asserted that his running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, had not requested any earmarks, the spending directives lawmakers insert in spending bills that McCain has vowed to eliminate.

Palin, in fact, requested $198 million in federal earmarks in February, including such expenses as $487,000 to fight obesity in Alaska and $4 million to develop recreational trails.

By day's end, the McCain campaign backed down from the claim the GOP presidential candidate made on the ABC television show "The View."


Palin camp clarifies extent of Iraq trip - Bryan Bender in the Boston Globe:
Sarah Palin's visit to Iraq in 2007 consisted of a brief stop at a border crossing between Iraq and Kuwait, the vice presidential candidate's campaign said yesterday, in the second official revision of her only trip outside North America.

Following her selection last month as John McCain's running mate, aides said Palin had traveled to Ireland, Germany, Kuwait, and Iraq to meet with members of the Alaska National Guard. During that trip she was said to have visited a "military outpost" inside Iraq. The campaign has since repeated that Palin's foreign travel included an excursion into the Iraq battle zone.

But in response to queries about the details of her trip, campaign aides and National Guard officials in Alaska said by telephone yesterday that she did not venture beyond the Kuwait-Iraq border when she visited Khabari Alawazem Crossing, also known as "K-Crossing," on July 25, 2007.

Asked to clarify where she traveled in Iraq, Palin's spokeswoman, Maria Comella, confirmed that "She visited a military outpost on the other side of the Kuwait-Iraq border."


McCain-Palin Crowd-Size Estimates Not Backed by Officials - Lorraine Woellert and Jeff Bliss in Bloomberg.com:
Senator John McCain has drawn some of the biggest crowds of his presidential campaign since adding Alaska Governor Sarah Palin to his ticket on Aug. 29. Now officials say they can't substantiate the figures McCain's aides are claiming.

McCain aide Kimmie Lipscomb told reporters on Sept. 10 that an outdoor rally in Fairfax City, Virginia, drew 23,000 people, attributing the crowd estimate to a fire marshal.

Fairfax City Fire Marshal Andrew Wilson said his office did not supply that number to the campaign and could not confirm it. Wilson, in an interview, said the fire department does not monitor attendance at outdoor events.


Why McCain is going so negative, so often - Jonathan Martin at Politico:
It’s hard to imagine a more unlikely perch for John McCain to be shamed for his increasingly hard-edged and truth-stretching campaign than the middle seat on "The View."

Yet on Friday morning, there sat the Republican nominee - a politician who has built an all but saintly reputation for "straight talk" over the years - caught in a vise between Joy Behar and Barbara Walters and getting a lecture from each on honesty.

"They're lies," Behar said of two recent lines of attack from the McCain campaign.

"By the way, you yourself said the same thing about putting lipstick on a pig," Walters interjected as a defensive McCain struggled to respond.

The two daytime talk show hosts are hardly alone.

McCain's tactics are drawing the scorn of many in the media and organizations tasked with fact-checking the truthfulness of campaigns. In recent weeks, Team McCain has been described as dishonorable, disingenuous and downright cynical.


McCain-Palin Distorts Our Finding - Brooks Jackson from FactCheck.org in Newsweek:
With its latest ad, released Sept. 10, the McCain-Palin campaign has altered our message in a fashion we consider less than honest. The ad strives to convey the message that FactCheck.org said "completely false" attacks on Sarah Palin had come from Sen. Barack Obama. We said no such thing. We have yet to dispute any claim from the Obama campaign about Palin.

They call the ad "Fact Check." It says "the attacks on Gov. Palin have been called 'completely false' ... 'misleading.' " On screen is a still photo of a grim-faced Obama. Our words are accurately quoted, but they had nothing to do with Obama.



Palin, McCain contradict each other on spending
- Carla Marinucci in the San Franciso Chronicle:
In a televised interview Friday, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin defended her request for an estimated $200 million in federal projects from Congress - even as earlier in the day her GOP running mate John McCain insisted Palin had never sought money from Congress.


Fact check: McCain on Palin and earmarks - Ryan J. Rusak in The Dallas Morning News:
For more on John McCain's incorrect claim that Sarah Palin has sought no earmarks as governor, click here. The Associated Press reports that Ms. Palin "asked for nearly $200 million in targeted spending for the 2009 fiscal year."

Along the same lines, McClatchy declares a new Republican ad "out of bounds" for its claim that Ms. Palin "vetoed nearly half a billion dollars in wasteful spending and cut earmark requests by hundreds of millions of dollars." While technically true, McClatchy says, the ad takes the remark out of context enough that its meaning is distorted.


McCain still peddles Palin mythology - Jay Bookman in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
Oh, and for those who ask, I’ll stop writing about it when they stop lying about it. Why?

Because their strategy is to keep restating these lies until people stop bothering to complain about it. And at that point, the lie will become accepted as the truth.

Except it's not the truth. And the truth matters.


Obama's new tack: McCain-Palin 'lying' - Andy Barr in The Hill:
During a campaign stop in Flint, Mich., on Monday, Obama hit Palin over her reversal on the so-called "Bridge to Nowhere," saying "she was for it until everybody started raising a fuss about it and she started running for governor and then suddenly she was against it."

"You can't just make stuff up," Obama added. "You can't just recreate yourself. You can't just reinvent yourself. The American people aren't stupid."

In addition to calling out the GOP for "not telling the truth" about Palin, the Obama campaign is targeting what running mate Sen. Joe Biden (Del.) called Palin’s "very extreme views."


Obama spokesman Bill Burton:
We will take no lectures from John McCain who is cynically running the sleaziest and least honorable campaign in modern Presidential campaign history. His discredited ads with disgusting lies are running all over the country today. He runs a campaign not worthy of the office he is seeking.


I pray that the traditional media continues to call McCain/Palin on their litany of lies (because I think it's clear that the campaign has every intention of continuing them).

I don't know how you fight against a party that has apparently decided that the truth doesn't matter any more - and who have sunk to these depths. How does a person of honour counter this? What can the Democrats do in the face of lie after lie after lie? It hurts my heart....


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Friday, September 12, 2008

Palin's interview with Charlie Gibson, part 1 - EPIC FAIL

Holy hell.

I've just been watching and reading Palin's first interview with Charlie Gibson, and all I can say is... heaven help America (and the rest of the world) if McCain and Palin end up in the White House.

Oh my God.

She doesn't know what the Bush Doctrine is.

To pre-empt anyone who says "well I don't know what the Bush Doctrine is either", here's a very sensible rebuttal-in-advance from orrg1, a DKos poster:

As for not knowing what the Bush doctrine is: the spin already is "so what? Lots of people don't know that!" Well Bullcrap. This was a central contention during the buildup to Iraq, whether preventive war made any sense, and if it did, whether and when it was justifiable. It was sometimes (in my memory at least) contrasted with the Powell doctrine, which says that you don't go to war unless you have a clear goal, a clear exit strategy, and overwhelming force. She should have been able to discuss that intelligently. Of course the fact that she couldn't wasn't a surprise, since she's admitted previously that she wasn't particularly interested in Iraq, but don't worry, now she's studying real hard! She's running for second in command of the whole damn country, and her foreign policy experience is eclipsed by a bunch of bloggers?

This isn't a matter of campaign spin. This is far, far more serious. With this kind of "job interview", anyone would feel reluctant giving this person a foreign policy job with far less responsibility than that of the Vice President of the United States.

Contrast Palin's response with Hillary answering a similar question - Hillary Clinton on with George Stephanopoulos - Part 3

Here's the wikipedia definition of the Bush Doctrine.

Plus a very interesting comment on CBS News - Palin And The Bush Doctrine:
To anyone who had been following foreign policy in even the most cursory way, but who had somehow forgotten what the name "Bush Doctrine" referred to, Charlie Gibson's explanation would have made it clear what big Bush administration change in policy was under discussion. "Oh, right", such a person would think: "that."

For that reason, one of the most striking things about Palin's response, to me, was this: in answering Gibson's question, she seemed to think that she was accepting the Bush Doctrine, but what she actually said just restated the old doctrine of preemption. When, as Palin said, "there is legitimate and enough intelligence that tells us that a strike is imminent against American people", the claim that we have the right to preempt that strike does not require the Bush Doctrine; it just requires the old, and much more widely accepted, doctrine of preemption. That is: in what Palin says here, she's not actually supporting the Bush Doctrine at all. She's just saying what generations of American Presidents and candidates have said: that when a country is actually about to attack us, we don't have to wait for them to actually land a blow before we can strike back.

The good news, I guess, is that when she's forced to make up an answer out of whole cloth, she goes with preemption, not prevention. She doesn't deny that she accepts the Bush Doctrine; she just doesn't say one way or the other. The bad news is that this makes it pretty clear that the problem isn't just that she doesn't know what the name "Bush Doctrine" refers to. She doesn't seem to know that there was a debate about preventive vs. preemptive war, in which the Bush administration came down decisively on the side of prevention. And that's a pretty important thing to be unaware of.

Palin casually threatens war with Russia if they stage an "unprovoked" attack on a NATO member (remember Georgia isn't currently a member of NATO and they were the ones that provoked Russia in the first place...).

Quotes from a couple of Kossaks (orrg1 and a gnostic) to help Sarah out here:
Here's what's wrong with her answer on Georgia and Russia. She wasn't wrong on the memorizable technical details. But it was the fact that she lightly threatened nuclear war with Russia while dealing with a hypothetical, and seemed to be partly oblivious of the fact. This type of subtlety if ignored during the Cuban MIssile Crisis could have spelled the end. She would be hopelessly over her head if she had to step in as President. I don't want to be accused of plagiarism, so I'll say I'm paraphrasing Palin's Dangerous Sable Rattling on Russia, an excellent read.

I think this is an even bigger deal than the fact that she tried to pretend that she knew what the Bush Doctrine was: Sarah Palin either didn't know that Georgian troops, who were trained by American special forces, initially attacked South Ossetia or she lied when she said that the Russians weren't provoked.

The fact is, the Russians WERE provoked.

And Gibson called her on it.

She says America needs to "get to a point in this world where war is not going to be a first option. In fact, war has got to be, a military strike, a last option." - which - correct me if I'm wrong - means she thinks that, for America, war is currently the first option.

She won't answer serious questions about what America should do if Israel decided to attack Iran, instead repeating three times that "we shouldn't second-guess Israel".

She thinks the fact that "They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska" gives her an insight into what Russia is doing in Georgia.

And finally:
GIBSON: And you didn't say to yourself, "Am I experienced enough? Am I ready? Do I know enough about international affairs? Do I -- will I feel comfortable enough on the national stage to do this?"

PALIN: I didn't hesitate, no.

GIBSON: Didn't that take some hubris?

PALIN: I -- I answered him yes because I have the confidence in that readiness and knowing that you can't blink, you have to be wired in a way of being so committed to the mission, the mission that we're on, reform of this country and victory in the war, you can't blink.

So I didn't blink then even when asked to run as his running mate.

Here's Norman J. Ornstein, Resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (from Politico - How did she do?):
She had me at hello Charley-- had me scared to death. Not a single doubt that she is ready to be president-- everyone, no matter how experienced, should have doubts about the ability to take that job. A combination of utter inexperience and utter arrogance is about the worst possible combination I can imagine.

Bloody hell.

Sarah Palin's Charlie Gibson ABC Interview: Video And Transcript

EXCERPTS: Charlie Gibson Interviews Sarah Palin

And finally... Sarah Palin Naked


Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

American Prayer



Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

McCain/Palin - the gift that keeps on giving

Palin cartoon: Community Chest card - You have won second prize in a beauty contest - collect Vice-Presidency. I kinda wish the new revelations and questions about John McCain's selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate would slow down a bit, because I've been trying to compose a single blog post for a couple of days now and I can't keep up!

I think I'm going to have to break it up into separate posts. I'm thinking of one on her policy positions, another on polls and numbers following the Veep announcement, another addressing the women's angle (do Hillary supporters like her? Why? Why not? What do other women think? Is she popular among women? Is this a pander to women? Do I think women will fall for it or do they not see it that way?).

Then there'll be one on her resume and experience, and comparisons with Obama's, and one on rumours and revelations (so far I have the AIP membership, Bridge to Nowhere, Council for National Policy, DairyGate, HockeyStadiumGate, dissing the veep job, earmarks for Wasilla, Ethics complaints, her previous presidential preferences, the Pledge of Allegiance, Ted Stevens and the 527, TrooperGate, what she (doesn't) know about the situation in Iraq, how many times they met before McCain chose her, and her Wikipedia alterations).

I was going to include the was she vetted properly? question in that section, but that's gotten so big now it will have to have its own post.

Then for fun I might finish up with McCain's wandering eyes and wedding ring fiddling videos - and his statement that "She's a partner, a soulmate" and that he's been "following her career for years and years".

Good grief. If this whole thing weren't so deadly serious, and if this election wasn't the most important one in years, the whole thing would be ridiculous to the point of being funny. In an "on-the-edge-of-hysteria" kind of a way.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Monday, September 01, 2008

Barack's beautiful speech

...because this is what I'm focusing on... that historic, ground-breaking and quite wonderful moment at Mile High Stadium in Denver where, in front of 84,000 people, Barack Obama accepted the Democratic Party's nomination for President - on the 45th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jnr's I have a Dream speech. Fantastic.



Wow. Just, wow.

I have been to the mountaintop - MLK cartoon of Obama's speech.

Interactive panorama from the New York Times of the scene at Invesco during Obama's speech:

New York Times panorama of Invesco.

And a couple more awesome images from Mile High Stadium. Just because.

The flag flies at Mile High Stadium.

I am my sister's keeper.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Friday, August 29, 2008

Most excellent speeches from the 2008 Democratic National Convention

These are my favourites so far:

Michelle Obama:



Hillary Clinton:



John Kerry:



Bill Clinton:



Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Monday, August 18, 2008

Why I'm boycotting the Olympics this year

A female activists holds up a torch, its flame a symbol for universal human rights, during an I love the Olympics. The spectacle, the excitement, wondering whether we will win gold this year, the sporting excellence on display for all to see.

But this year, I've decided I won't be watching any of it. No opening or closing ceremonies, no sporting events that normally I would have loved to have watched.

Why? Because it's clear that China has an appalling record on Human Rights, and contrary to all their promises (and the promises of the International Olympic Committe), the abuse of human rights in China has actually got worse in the run-up to the Olympics, not better. As if we couldn't see that coming.

Human Rights


Here's Amnesty International on the subject:
28 July 2008: The Chinese authorities have broken their promise to improve the country's human rights situation and betrayed the core values of the Olympics, according to a new Amnesty International report.

The Olympics Countdown: Broken Promises concludes that in most of these areas human rights have continued to deteriorate since the previous Amnesty International report The Olympics Countdown: Crackdown on Activists Threatens Olympic Legacy, which was published in April this year.

In the run-up to the Olympics, the Chinese authorities have locked up, put under house arrest and forcibly removed individuals they believe may threaten the image of "stability" and "harmony" they want to present to the world.

"By continuing to persecute and punish those who speak out for human rights, the Chinese authorities have lost sight of the promises they made when they were granted the Games seven years ago," said Roseann Rife, Asia-Pacific Deputy Director at Amnesty International.

There's more... including details of online censorship and blocking of a wide range of websites to journalists covering the Games in China, despite official promises to ensure "complete media freedom".
Amnesty International also believes that local activists and journalists working on human rights issues in China are at particular risk of abuse during the Games. Chinese journalists operate in a climate of censorship, unable to report on issues deemed sensitive by the authorities, and many still languish in jail for reporting on such issues.

Housing rights activist Ye Guozhu continues to serve his four-year sentence for "picking quarrels and stirring up trouble" because of his opposition to the seizure and demolition of property to make way for new construction projects for next month's Olympic Games.

China is still the world's top executioner. The Supreme People's Court (SPC) initiated a review of the death penalty that is believed to have resulted in a significant drop in executions. A senior official said that in the first half of 2008 15 per cent of death sentences were rejected by the SPC.

However, the authorities continue to refuse to disclose the full number of those sentenced to death and executed - the total figure remains a state secret. Estimates put the number of those executed every year in the thousands. Around 68 offences - including non-violent crimes such as drug-related offences – are punishable by death in China.

View the complete Amnesty International report in HTML or as a pdf.

Human Rights Watch says:
The run-up to the Beijing Olympics has been marred by a well-documented surge in violations of the rights of free expression and association, as well as media freedom. In addition, abuses of migrant construction workers who were pivotal to Beijing's infrastructure improvements have increased, as have evictions of Beijing residents whose homes were demolished to make way for that infrastructure. Those abuses reflect both the Chinese government's wholesale failure to honor its Olympics-related human rights promises, as well as the negligence of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in ensuring that China fulfills its commitments.

"The Chinese government and the International Olympic Committee have had seven years to deliver on their pledges that these games would further human rights," said Sophie Richardson, Asia advocacy director for Human Rights Watch. "Instead, the Beijing Games have prompted a rollback in some of the most basic rights enshrined in China’s constitution and international law."

There's more - China: Olympics Harm Key Human Rights.

Destruction of homes


An elderly Chinese woman with bound feet walks through the rubble of demolished homes in a 'hutong' or lane. Or how about the fact that thousands of Chinese people were forcibly removed from their homes, which were demolished to make way for the Olympic stadiums and infrastructure surrounding the Games. The Chinese government claimed that they were all fully compensated and happy, but this is not true:

Tiananmen Square


In Tiananmen Square in June 1989, the Chinese government massacred an unknown number of peaceful protestors. 19 years later, about 130 prisoners are still being held for their role in the demonstrations that were crushed in the military crackdown:






Tibet


And then there's Tibet, which since 1949 has been occupied by China. Tibet has a history of at least 1300 years of independence from China. In 821 the two countries ended almost 200 years of fighting with a treaty engraved on three stone pillars, one of which still stands in front of the Jokhang cathedral in Lhasa.

Tibetan activists and supporters wave placards and flags as they take part in a peace march along with the group of around 100 core marchers in Dharamsala on March 10, 2008, to commemorate the 49th anniversary of the Tibetan Uprising Day.
From Free Tibet - 10 facts about Tibet

Chinese occupation has resulted in the death of over one million Tibetans, the destruction of over 6,000 monasteries, nunneries and temples, and the imprisonment and torture of thousands of Tibetans.

The basic freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly are strictly limited, and arbitrary arrests continue. There are currently hundreds of political prisoners in Tibet, enduring a commonplace punishment of torture.

The Chinese government increasingly encourages Han Chinese to migrate to Tibet, offering them higher wages and other inducements. This policy is threatening the survival of Tibetan people. Tibetans are becoming a minority in the TAR. Yearly, thousands of Tibetans still flee from Tibet, making the treacherous journey over the Himalayas into a world of exile.

Find out more about Tibet:

Persecution of Falun Gong (Falun Dafa)


From AsiaSource:
During the Republican National Convention in 2004, a group of Falun Gong followers meditate in Union Square and distribute literature to raise awareness of the group's persecution at the hands of the Chinese government. The Chinese government banned the spiritual group Falun Gong claiming it is an evil cult that threatens social stability and spreads superstitious thinking. The Chinese Communist Party... accuses Falun Gong of illegal gatherings, theft, and actions causing the death of followers. Li Hongzhi, the founder of Falun Gong... insists that Falun Gong is apolitical and has no intention of threatening its followers or the power of the Chinese government. Despite these assurances, the government has instigated an official crackdown on members including mass arrests, beatings, labor camps, charges of treason and subversion, and vilification in the official media.


Chinese working conditions and slavery


Rural workers rescued from an illegal brickyard at the village of Linfen, in northeast China. In order to produce the cheap goods that we in the Western world take for granted, working conditions for many in China are pretty appalling - with slavery becoming more widespread. In June 2007, police said they had rescued more than 500 people from forced labor in brick kilns, where they were worked 18 hours a day and beaten if they tried to escape:

I know my little boycott won't make the slightest difference to China - but knowing what I do about the way the Chinese government treats its people, I just can't bring myself to watch the Olympics this year. I can't just look the other way and pretend that all is well.

Much as sportsmen and women would like to believe that politics and sport shouldn't mix, I can't see how they can be anything but inextricably intertwined. Politics and sport do mix - because politics determines how each of us lives our life, and underpins everything we do.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Sunday, August 17, 2008

McCain vs YouTube, The Daily Show on Georgia, and Baracky II

Three videos you really ought to watch...

Firstly a grassroots-produced video on McCain and his best buddy Bush - hattip to kossak cartwrightdale - this is brilliantly done!



Next up is John Stewart on the Daily Show, looking at the situation in Georgia, during which we are privileged to share in a stunning piece of hypocritical nonsense from McCain when he pontificates that "In the 21st century, nations don't invade other nations".

Good grief. I think he forgot the caveat (unless you're America). Maybe he just thinks it goes without saying...



And finally, for a bit of a larf (actually, it's bloody good!), here's BARACKY II:



Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Saturday, August 16, 2008

Do you speak morse? Or even better, machine code?

- --- -.. .- -.-- / -- .. -.- . / .- -. -.. / .. / . -. - . .-. - .- .. -. . -.. / --- ..- .-. ... . .-.. ...- . ... / ..-. --- .-. / --.- ..- .. - . / .- / .-- .... .. .-.. . / -... -.-- / . -- .- .. .-.. .. -. --. / . .- -.-. .... / --- - .... . .-. / .. -. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . .-.-.- / .. / --. ..- . ... ... / .-- . / .... .- -.. / .- / -... .. - / - --- --- / -- ..- -.-. .... / ... .--. .- .-. . / - .. -- . / --- -. / --- ..- .-. / .... .- -. -.. ... / - --- -.. .- -.-- !

0010110100100000001011100010111000101110001011100010000
0001011100010000000101101001011100010000000101111001000
0000101110001011010010110100100000001011100010000000101
1110010000000101101001011100010110100101101001011100010
1101001000000010110100101101001011010010000000101110001
0110100101110001000000010110100101101001011100010111000
1011010010110100100000001011110010000000101110001011010
0101110001000000010111000101101001000000010110100100000
0010111000101110001011100010111000100000001011100010000
0001011100010110100101110001000000010110100101101001011
1000101110001011010010110100100000001011110010000000101
1010010110100100000001011100010111000100000001011010010
1110001011010010000000101110001000000010110100101110001
0110100101101001011100010110100100000001011110010000000
1011010010110100101110001000000010110100101101001011010
0100000001011010010000000101111001000000010111000101101
0010111000100000001011100010000000101110001011010010000
0001011100010110100101110001011100010000000101110001011
0100101110001011100010000000101101001011100010110100101
1010010000000101111001000000010111000101101001011100010
0000001011100010110100100000001011010010111000101110001
0000000101110001011100010000000101101001011100010110100
1011100010000000101110001011010010000000101110001011010
0101110001011100010000000101111001000000010111000101101
0010000000101101001011100010000000101101001011100010111
0001000000010111100100000001011010010111000101110001000
0000101110001000000010110100101110001011010010111000100
0000010111000101110001000000010110100101110001011100010
0000001011100010000000101101001011100010111000100000001
0111100100000001011100010111000100000001011010010000000
1011110010000000101110001011010010110100100000001011010
0101101001011010010000000101110001011100010110100100000
0010111000101101001011100010111000100000001011010010111
0001011100010000000101111001000000010110100101110001011
1000101110001000000010111000100000001011110010000000101
1100010000000101110001011100010111000101101001000000010
1110001000000010110100101110001000000010111100100000001
0110100101110001011100010111000100000001011100010000000
1011010010000000101101001000000010111000100000001011100
0101101001011100010000000101111001000000010110100100000
0010110100101101001011010010000000101111001000000010110
1001011010010111000100000001011100010000000101101001000
0000101111001000000010110100101110001011100010111000100
0000010111000101101001000000010110100101110001011010010
1110001000000010110100101110001011010010000000101111001
0000000101101001000000010110100101101001011010010000000
1011110010000000101101001011100010111000101110001000000
0101110001011010010000000101110001011100010111000100000
0010111000101110001000000010110100101110001011010010111
0001000000010111000101110001011100010000000101111001000
0000101110001011010010000000101101001011100010000000101
1010010111000101110001000000010111100100000001011100010
1110001011010010000000101110001011100010111000100000001
0111000100000001011110010000000101101001011010010000000
1011100010110100100000001011010010111000101101001011100
0100000001011100010111000101110001011100010000000101110
0010111000100000001011010010111000100000001011100010000
0001011110010000000101101001011100010110100101110001000
0000101101001011010010110100100000001011010010111000101
1100010000000101110001000000010111100100000001011010010
1110001011010010110100101110001011010010000000101101001
0111000101110001011100010000000101110001011100010000000
1011010010111000100000001011100010110100100000001011100
0101101001011100010000000101101001011100010110100101101
0010000000101101001011100010110100101101001011100010110
1001000000010111100100000001011100010111000100000001011
0100101110001000000010111000101110001011100010000000101
1010010000000101110001000000010111000101101001000000010
1101001011100010111000100000001011100010110100101110001
011010010111000101101

.-- . / .-. . .- .-.. .-.. -.-- / -.. --- / -. . . -.. / - --- / --. . - / --- ..- - / -- --- .-. . .-.-.- .-.-.- .-.-.-

These might help...

Morse Code Translator

Binary - it's digitalicious!


Technorati tags: , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Friday, August 08, 2008

Singing puppies to sleep...

OK here's this week's "too cute for words" segment:



Awwwwwwwwwwwww

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Like, totally ready to lead

OK I never ever thought I'd say this - let alone link to anything by Ms Hilton - but this ad just made me laugh - and I would say my respect for her (which was pretty much zero) just went up a couple of notches...


"But then that wrinkly white-haired guy used me in his campaign ad, which I guess means I'm running for president. So thanks for the endorsement white-haired dude, and I want America to know that I'm, like, totally ready to lead."

According to the TimesOnline:
Funnyordie.com contributors Adam McKay and Chris Henchy pitched the idea of the video to Ms Hilton after the McCain ads were debated around the world.

"She got it that the McCain thing was a low blow," McKay told AFP. "And she felt she didn't want to return it with angry fire, and that this was the best way to respond. It's a playful jab."

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Where on Earth will YOU vote?

This one's for all my American friends who live here in New Zealand.

Hey Mike, Jeffrey, Sue, Brian and Philip - did you know that you have the right to vote in the US elections in November? Request your absentee ballot now! It's very easy...



Go to votefromabroad.org to get your absentee ballot - just use your mouse!


Technorati tags: , , , , , , .

Read the full post

Monday, August 04, 2008

Rest in peace, Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Alexander Solzhenitsyn. I picked up a battered copy of Cancer Ward about 25 years ago when I was travelling. It gathered me up and took me away into its strange little world, and I've loved his novels ever since.

I have a first edition of the English translation of One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich which I picked up in a second-hand bookshop in Wellington a few years ago. It replaced my dog-eared paperback copy which I donated to my Book Club. I think a few people there have read it now, which I'm very glad about. It's a stunning piece of writing, so sparse and so incredibly real - every detail - down to the fish in his soup and the crumbs from his bread - drawn with such precision and detail:

The little fish were more bone than flesh; the flesh had been boiled off the bone and had disintegrated, leaving a few remnants on head and tail. Without neglecting a single fish-scale or particle of flesh on the brittle skeleton, Shukhov went on champing his teeth and sucking the bones, spitting the remains on the table. He ate everything - the gills, the tail, the eyes when they were still in their sockets but not when they'd been boiled out and floated in the bowl separately - great fish-eyes! Not then. The others laughed at him for that.

He laid his mittens on his knees, unbuttoned his coat, untied the tapes of his face-cloth, stiff with cold, folded it several times over and put it away in his knee-pocket. Then he reached for the hunk of bread, wrapped in a piece of clean cloth, and, holding the cloth at chest level so that not a crumb should fall to the ground, began to nibble and chew at the bread. The bread, which he had carried under two garments, had been warmed by his body. The frost hadn't caught it at all.

Shukhov went to sleep fully content. He'd had many strokes of luck that day: they hadn't put him in the cells; they hadn't sent the team to the settlement; he'd pinched a bowl of kasha at dinner; the team-leader had fixed the rates well; he'd built a wall and enjoyed doing it; he'd smuggled that bit of hacksaw-blade through; he'd earned something from Tsezar in the evening; he'd bought that tobacco. And he hadn't fallen ill. He'd got over it.

A day without a dark cloud. Almost a happy day.

There were three thousand six hundred and fifty-three days like that in his stretch. From the first clang of the rail to the last clang of the rail.

The extra three days were for leap years.

It was The Gulag Archipelago that opened my eyes to the true horror of Stalin's Soviet Union. I didn't like history much at school, giving it up in my fourth year, so I never got as far as 20th century history. Which is a shame, because I'm sure it would have been more interesting than all those boring Kings and Queens. Anyway, I was a wee bit hazy on Stalin until I read The Gulag Archipelago. And now I know what a monster he was.
And so the waves foamed and rolled. But over them all, in 1929-1930, billowed and gushed the multimillion wave of dispossessed kulaks. It was immeasurably large and it could certainly not have been housed in even the highly developed network of Soviet interrogation prisons (which in any case were packed full by the "gold" wave). Instead, it bypassed the prisons, going directly to the transit prisons and camps, onto prisoner transport, into the Gulag country.

Solzhenitsyn believed that as many as 60 million people perished during the rule of Stalin between 1924 and 1953. The Gulag Archipelago is an amazing masterwork, a labour of love and a memoriam to all those who died at Stalin's behest.

Author's note on the publication of The Gulag Archipelago: For years I have with a reluctant heart withheld from publication this already completed book: my obligation to those still living outweighed my obligation to the dead. But now that State Security has seized the book anyway, I have no alternative but to publish it immediately.

In this book there are no fictitious persons, nor fictitious events, people and places are named with their own names. If they are identified with initials instead of names, it is for personal considerations. If they are not named at all, it is only because human memory has failed to preserve their names. But it all took place just as it is here described.


Rest in peace, Alexander. You led an amazing life, and opened so many eyes along the way. Thank you.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Read the full post